A High-Sensitivity Gas Sensor for Simultaneous Detection of Methane and Ethane in Urban Gas Networks

Authors

  • Zhao Rao southeast university Author
  • Bin Zhou southeast university Author
  • Denghao Zhu southeast university Author
  • Xiao Chen Technology Innovation Center of Safety Operations and Maintenance for Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Equipment Facilities for Jiangsu Province Market Regulation Author
  • Jingjing Liu Technology Innovation Center of Safety Operations and Maintenance for Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Equipment Facilities for Jiangsu Province Market Regulation Author
  • Yuan Lv Technology Innovation Center of Safety Operations and Maintenance for Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Equipment Facilities for Jiangsu Province Market Regulation Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70917/jcc-2025-020

Keywords:

urban natural gas leakage, safety Inspection, dual-component gas, mid-infrared, mobile monitoring

Abstract

To address the challenge of precise discrimination of multi-component trace gases for urban natural gas leakage monitoring, a dual-component gas sensor based on mid-infrared laser absorption spectroscopy was developed for simultaneous detection of methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6). The sensor integrates an interband cascade laser, a 13-m optical path length multi-pass gas cell and a high-sensitivity detector. The optimal absorption lines of CH4 and C2H6 were identified through analysis of gas absorption spectra, and the negative-pressure (0.24 atm) operation was applied to effectively suppress water vapor interference, which significantly improved the anticross-interference capability. Experimental results demonstrate minimum detection limits of 17.77 parts-per-billion in volume (ppbv) for CH4 and 12.95 ppbv for C2H6 at a 1-second averaging time, and the dynamic response time is approximately 6 s. During the In-vehicle mobile monitoring experiment, the changes of CH4 and C2H6 concentrations near the leakage source show a high degree of correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9991), which effectively distinguishes natural gas leakage from biogenic and anthropogenic interference sources such as landfills, automobile exhaust. This research provides a high-precision and low-false-alarm solution for the safety inspection of urban gas pipeline networks, and the application scenarios can be further expanded through miniaturization and intelligent optimization in the future.

References

Li, M., Zheng, H., Xue, X., et al. (2019). Reliability evaluation and management of PetroChina's large-scale system of natural gas pipeline networks. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 4(5), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnggs.2019.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnggs.2019.07.003

Faramawy, S., Zaki, T., & Sakr, A. A.-E. (2016). Natural gas origin, composition, and processing: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 34, 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.030

Halley, S. (2021). Combined mixed potential electrochemical sensors and artificial neural networks for the quantification and identification of methane in natural gas emissions monitoring. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 168, 097506. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac2465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac2465

Cho, Y., Smits, K. M., Riddick, S. N., et al. (2022). Calibration and field deployment of low-cost sensor network to monitor underground pipeline leakage. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 355, 131276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131276

Shelton, S., Liyanage, G., Jayasekara, S., et al. (2022). Seasonal variability of air pollutants and their relationships to meteorological parameters in an urban environment. Advances in Meteorology, 2022, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5628911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5628911

Rosli Razak, T., Hafiz Ismail, M., Jarimi, H., et al. (2025). Machine learning-based predictive models for indoor air quality and thermal comfort: Bridging sensor data and human perception in healthcare facilities. Energy Catalyst, 1, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.61552/ec.2025.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61552/EC.2025.003

Barriault, M., Alexander, I., Tasnim, N., et al. (2021). Classification and regression of binary hydrocarbon mixtures using single metal oxide semiconductor sensor with application to natural gas detection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 326, 129012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.129012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.129012

Menduni, G., Zifarelli, A., Sampaolo, A., et al. (2022). High-concentration methane and ethane QEPAS detection employing partial least squares regression to filter out energy relaxation dependence on gas matrix composition. Photoacoustics, 26, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100349

Aldhafeeri, T., Tran, M.-K., Vrolyk, R., et al. (2020). A review of methane gas detection sensors: Recent developments and future perspectives. Inventions, 5(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5030028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions5030028

Jeevaretanam, B., Abuseada, M., Wei, C., et al. (2023). Transient analysis of solar pyrolysis and hydrogen yield via interband cascade laser absorption spectroscopy of methane, acetylene, ethylene, and ethane. Applications in Energy and Combustion Science, 16, 100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100223

Davis, N. M., Francis, D., Hodgkinson, J., et al. (2023). Compact methane sensor using an integrating sphere and interband cascade laser at 3313 nm. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 389, 133866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.133866

McHale, L. E., Martinez, B., Miller, T. W., et al. (2019). Open-path cavity ring-down methane sensor for mobile monitoring of natural gas emissions. Optics Express, 27(14), 20084–20097. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.020084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.020084

Sampaolo, A., Csutak, S., Patimisco, P., et al. (2019). Methane, ethane and propane detection using a compact quartz enhanced photoacoustic sensor and a single interband cascade laser. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 282, 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.11.132

Floridia, C., Rosolem, J. B., Fracarolli, J. P.-V., et al. (2019). Evaluation of environmental influences on a multi-point optical fiber methane leak monitoring system. Remote Sensing, 11(10), 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101249

Zou, M., Sun, L., & Wang, X. (2022). CH4/C2H6 dual-gas sensing system based on wavelength modulation spectroscopy using a single near infrared laser. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 272, 120970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.120970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2022.120970

Zifarelli, A., Sampaolo, A., Patimisco, P., et al. (2023). Methane and ethane detection from natural gas level down to trace concentrations using a compact mid-IR LITES sensor based on univariate calibration. Photoacoustics, 29, 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100448

Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., et al. (2022). The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 277, 107949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

Downloads

Published

2025-09-28 — Updated on 2026-10-11

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A High-Sensitivity Gas Sensor for Simultaneous Detection of Methane and Ethane in Urban Gas Networks. (2026). Journal of Climate Change, 11(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.70917/jcc-2025-020 (Original work published 2025)